On Causal and Anticausal Learning
Bernhard Schoelkopf (Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems),, Dominik Janzing (Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems), Jonas Peters, (Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems), Eleni Sgouritsa (Max Planck, Institute for Intelligent Systems)

TL;DR
This paper explores how understanding causal relationships can improve function estimation in machine learning, especially under challenges like covariate shift and semi-supervised learning, supported by empirical evidence.
Contribution
It introduces a hypothesis on when semi-supervised learning benefits from causal knowledge and provides empirical validation for this hypothesis.
Findings
Causal knowledge can enhance semi-supervised learning effectiveness.
The paper formulates conditions under which causal understanding aids learning.
Empirical results support the proposed hypothesis.
Abstract
We consider the problem of function estimation in the case where an underlying causal model can be inferred. This has implications for popular scenarios such as covariate shift, concept drift, transfer learning and semi-supervised learning. We argue that causal knowledge may facilitate some approaches for a given problem, and rule out others. In particular, we formulate a hypothesis for when semi-supervised learning can help, and corroborate it with empirical results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Data Stream Mining Techniques · Machine Learning and Algorithms
