Investigations of surface quality and SRF cavity performance
G. Wu, M. Ge (Fermilab), P. Kneisel (Jefferson Lab), K. Zhao (Peking, U.), J. Ozelis, D. Sergatskov, C. Cooper (Fermilab)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how surface quality impacts SRF cavity performance, concluding that surface roughness plays a secondary role compared to other primary factors affecting cavity limitations.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of various single cell cavities, highlighting the limited influence of surface roughness on RF performance amidst other dominant factors.
Findings
Surface roughness has a secondary effect on cavity performance.
Other primary factors significantly influence cavity limitations.
Progress in niobium cavity manufacturing has advanced performance analysis.
Abstract
Magnetic field enhancement has been studied in the past through replica and cavity cutting. Considerable progress of niobium cavity manufacturing and processing has been made since then. Wide variety of single cell cavities has been analyzed through replica technique. Their RF performances were compared in corresponding to geometric RF surface quality. It is concluded that the surface roughness affects cavity performance mostly in secondary role. The other factors must have played primary role in cavity performance limitations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle accelerators and beam dynamics · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
