Astrophysical analysis of the measurement of (alpha,gamma) and (alpha,n) cross sections of 169Tm
T. Rauscher, G. G. Kiss, T. Sc\"ucs, Zs. F\"ul\"op, C. Fr\"ohlich, Gy., Gy\"urky, Z. Hal\'asz, Zs. Kert\'esz, E. Somorjai

TL;DR
This study measures the cross sections of 169Tm reactions with alpha particles at various energies, compares them with theoretical models, and discusses implications for astrophysical gamma-process nucleosynthesis.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method combining activation with X-ray counting for measuring reaction cross sections and analyzes energy dependence of alpha widths in astrophysical contexts.
Findings
Measured (alpha,gamma) and (alpha,n) cross sections at lower energies than before.
Observed deviations from theoretical predictions below 14 MeV, indicating the need for modified alpha widths.
Revised astrophysical reaction rates are higher than previous estimates by factors of 2 to 37.
Abstract
Reaction cross sections of 169Tm(alpha,gamma)173Lu and 169Tm(alpha,n)172Lu have been measured in the energy range 12.6<=E_alpha<=17.5 MeV and 11.5<=E_alpha<=17.5 MeV, respectively, using the recently introduced method of combining activation with X-ray counting. Improved shielding allowed to measure the (alpha,gamma) to lower energy than previously possible. The combination of (alpha,gamma) and (alpha,n) data made it possible to study the energy dependence of the alpha width. While absolute value and energy dependence are perfectly reproduced by theory at energies above 14 MeV, the observed change in energy dependence at energies below 14 MeV requires a modification of the predicted alpha width. Using an effective, energy-dependent, local optical alpha+nucleus potential it is possible to reproduce the data but the astrophysical rate is still not well constrained at gamma-process…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
