Reply to Comment by V. R. Shaginyan et al. on "Zeeman-Driven Lifshitz Transition: A Model for the Experimentally Observed Fermi-Surface Reconstruction in YbRh2Si2"
Andreas Hackl, Matthias Vojta
TL;DR
This paper is a reply to a comment on a previous study about a model explaining Fermi-surface reconstruction in YbRh2Si2 driven by Zeeman effect, addressing critiques and clarifying the original findings.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed response defending the Zeeman-driven Lifshitz transition model against critiques, clarifying its relevance to experimental observations.
Findings
Reaffirms the validity of the Zeeman-driven Lifshitz transition model
Addresses and clarifies points raised in the comment by Shaginyan et al.
Supports the model's consistency with experimental data on YbRh2Si2
Abstract
A reply to the comment by V. R. Shaginyan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 279701 (2011), arXiv:1206.5372] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRare-earth and actinide compounds · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · High-pressure geophysics and materials