Constraining gamma-ray pulsar gap models with a simulated pulsar population
M. Pierbattista, I. A. Grenier, A. K. Harding, and P. L. Gonthier

TL;DR
This study uses population synthesis to compare gamma-ray pulsar models with Fermi LAT data, revealing that outer gap models fit observations well, while polar cap models underpredict high Edot pulsars, suggesting the need for more luminous gaps.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of four gamma-ray gap models with Fermi LAT data, highlighting the necessity for adjustments in luminosity and beam geometry to match observations.
Findings
Outer gap models can account for Fermi detections with standard luminosity.
Slot gap models require increased luminosity, possibly via offset polar caps.
Polar cap models underpredict high Edot pulsars and their joint radio and gamma-ray detection probability.
Abstract
With the large sample of young gamma-ray pulsars discovered by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT), population synthesis has become a powerful tool for comparing their collective properties with model predictions. We synthesised a pulsar population based on a radio emission model and four gamma-ray gap models (Polar Cap, Slot Gap, Outer Gap, and One Pole Caustic) normalizing to the number of detected radio pulsars in select group of surveys. The luminosity and the wide beams from the outer gaps can easily account for the number of Fermi detections in 2 years of observations. The wide slot-gap beams requires an increase by a factor of ~10 of the predicted luminosity to produce a reasonable number of gamma-ray pulsars. Such large increases in the luminosity may be accommodated by implementing offset polar caps. The narrow polar-cap beams contribute at most only a handful of LAT pulsars.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
