On the presence of nonjet "higher harmonic" components in 2D angular correlations from high energy heavy ion collisions
Thomas A. Trainor, Duncan J. Prindle, R. L. Ray

TL;DR
This paper investigates the origins of higher harmonic components in 2D angular correlations from high-energy heavy ion collisions, emphasizing that jet-like structures dominate these multipoles and challenging the interpretation of them as purely hydrodynamic flow.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that jet-like correlations primarily account for higher multipoles, questioning the necessity of nonjet flow interpretations in 2D angular correlation analyses.
Findings
Jet-like correlations dominate higher multipoles.
Higher multipoles can be explained by jet structures, not necessarily flow.
2D fits do not require nonjet contributions to explain data.
Abstract
It is conjectured that several higher harmonic flows may result from initial-state geometry fluctuations in \aa collisions coupled to a radially-expanding medium. But as with "elliptic flow" measurements, non-hydrodynamic mechanisms such as jet production may contribute to other higher azimuth multipoles as biases. Careful distinctions should be maintained between jet-related and nonjet (possibly hydrodynamic) contributions to (e.g., "nonflow" and "flow"). In this study we consider several questions: (a) To what extent do jet-like structures in two-dimensional (2D) angular correlations contribute to azimuth multipoles inferred from various methods? (b) If a multipole element is added to a 2D fit model is a nonzero amplitude indicative of a corresponding flow component? and (c) Can 2D correlations establish the necessity of nonjet contributions to some or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
