Toward an accurate mass function for precision cosmology
Darren S. Reed (1), Robert E. Smith (1,2), Doug Potter (1), Aurel, Schneider (1), Joachim Stadel (1), Ben Moore (1) ((1) ITP-Zurich, (2), AIfA-Bonn)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that gravity-only cosmological simulations can achieve the high accuracy needed for precision cosmology by carefully selecting simulation parameters and initial conditions, highlighting current limitations and future challenges.
Contribution
It provides guidelines for simulation setup to attain percent-level accuracy in the halo mass function, emphasizing the importance of initial conditions and resolution for cosmological applications.
Findings
Percent-level accuracy achievable with second order Lagrangian Perturbation Theory
Optimal start epoch is between 10 and 50 expansion factors before halo formation
Mass function for halos with fewer than ~1000 particles is highly sensitive to simulation parameters
Abstract
Cosmological surveys aim to use the evolution of the abundance of galaxy clusters to accurately constrain the cosmological model. In the context of LCDM, we show that it is possible to achieve the required percent level accuracy in the halo mass function with gravity-only cosmological simulations, and we provide simulation start and run parameter guidelines for doing so. Some previous works have had sufficient statistical precision, but lacked robust verification of absolute accuracy. Convergence tests of the mass function with, for example, simulation start redshift can exhibit false convergence of the mass function due to counteracting errors, potentially misleading one to infer overly optimistic estimations of simulation accuracy. Percent level accuracy is possible if initial condition particle mapping uses second order Lagrangian Perturbation Theory, and if the start epoch is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
