Titan's transport-driven methane cycle
Jonathan L. Mitchell

TL;DR
This paper proposes that Titan's methane cycle is much stronger than previously thought, driven by atmospheric heat transport indicated by radiative imbalance measurements, leading to more cloud formation and precipitation.
Contribution
It introduces a new method linking radiative imbalance to atmospheric heat transport, suggesting Titan's methane cycle is 10-20 times stronger than prior estimates.
Findings
Radiative imbalance implies significant latitudinal heat transport.
Climate simulations show substantial cloud formation and precipitation.
Methane cycle strength could be 10-20 times previous estimates.
Abstract
The strength of Titan's methane cycle, as measured by precipitation and evaporation, is key to interpreting fluvial erosion and other indicators of the surface-atmosphere exchange of liquids. But the mechanisms behind the occurrence of large cloud outbursts and precipitation on Titan have been disputed. A gobal- and annual-mean estimate of surface fluxes indicated only 1% of the insolation, or 0.04 W/m, is exchanged as sensible and/or latent fluxes. Since these fluxes are responsible for driving atmospheric convection, it has been argued that moist convection should be quite rare and precipitation even rarer, even if evaporation globally dominates the surface-atmosphere energy exchange. In contrast, climate simulations that allow atmospheric motion indicate a robust methane cycle with substantial cloud formation and/or precipitation. We argue the top-of-atmosphere radiative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
