A new density variance - Mach number relation for subsonic and supersonic, isothermal turbulence
Lukas Konstandin, Philipp Girichidis, Christoph Federrath, Ralf S., Klessen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new linear relation linking density variance and Mach number in isothermal turbulence, validated through high-resolution simulations across subsonic to supersonic regimes, and accounts for different forcing mechanisms.
Contribution
It proposes a novel linear relation between density variance and compressible velocity, reducing dependence on forcing type, supported by extensive hydrodynamical simulations.
Findings
Density variance scales linearly with Mach number, with a forcing-dependent proportionality.
A new relation links density variance to compressible velocity fluctuations, independent of forcing.
Results span Mach numbers from 0.1 to 15, covering subsonic to supersonic turbulence.
Abstract
The probability density function (PDF) of the gas density in subsonic and supersonic, isothermal, driven turbulence is analyzed with a systematic set of hydrodynamical grid simulations with resolutions up to 1024^3 cells. We performed a series of numerical experiments with root mean square (r.m.s.) Mach number M ranging from the nearly incompressible, subsonic (M=0.1) to the highly compressible, supersonic (M=15) regime. We study the influence of two extreme cases for the driving mechanism by applying a purely solenoidal (divergence-free) and a purely compressive (curl-free) forcing field to drive the turbulence. We find that our measurements fit the linear relation between the r.m.s. Mach number and the standard deviation of the density distribution in a wide range of Mach numbers, where the proportionality constant depends on the type of the forcing. In addition, we propose a new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
