The nonlinear matter and velocity power spectra in f(R) gravity
Baojiu Li (Durham), Wojciech A. Hellwing (Durham), Kazuya Koyama, (Portsmouth), Gong-Bo Zhao (Portsmouth), Elise Jennings (Chicago), Carlton, M. Baugh (Durham)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the nonlinear matter and velocity power spectra in f(R) gravity using large N-body simulations, revealing significant deviations from LCDM predictions, especially in velocity spectra, and highlighting the importance of nonlinear effects and the chameleon mechanism.
Contribution
It provides detailed simulation-based predictions of matter and velocity power spectra in f(R) gravity, emphasizing the nonlinear regime and the limitations of linear theory for these models.
Findings
Nonlinear effects require more precise simulations than LCDM.
Velocity divergence spectra show larger deviations than matter spectra.
The evolution pattern is governed by the chameleon mechanism and model parameters.
Abstract
We study the matter and velocity divergence power spectra in a f(R) gravity theory and their time evolution measured from several large-volume N-body simulations with varying box sizes and resolution. We find that accurate prediction of the matter power spectrum in f(R) gravity places stronger requirements on the simulation than is the case with LCDM, because of the nonlinear nature of the fifth force. Linear perturbation theory is shown to be a poor approximation for the f(R) models, except when the chameleon effect is very weak. We show that the relative differences from the fiducial LCDM model are much more pronounced in the nonlinear tail of the velocity divergence power spectrum than in the matter power spectrum, which suggests that future surveys which target the collection of peculiar velocity data will open new opportunities to constrain modified gravity theories. A close…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
