Commentary on Bayesian coincidence assessment (cross-matching)
Thomas J. Loredo

TL;DR
This commentary discusses Bayesian methods for astronomical cross-matching, highlighting the importance of prior probability assignment and proposing hierarchical Bayes as a principled framework for large-scale probabilistic object identification.
Contribution
It provides a critical review of Bayesian cross-identification and introduces hierarchical Bayes as a solution for prior probability assignment in large-scale astronomical data analysis.
Findings
Hierarchical Bayes justifies pragmatic prior assignment rules.
Bayesian methods improve cross-matching accuracy.
Open issues in prior probability estimation are discussed.
Abstract
This paper is an invited commentary on Tamas Budavari's presentation, "On statistical cross-identification in astronomy," for the Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy V conference held at Pennsylvania State University in June 2011. I begin with a brief review of previous work on probabilistic (Bayesian) assessment of directional and spatio-temporal coincidences in astronomy (e.g., cross-matching or cross-identification of objects across multiple catalogs). Then I discuss an open issue in the recent innovative work of Budavari and his colleagues on large-scale probabilistic cross-identification: how to assign prior probabilities that play an important role in the analysis. With a simple toy problem, I show how Bayesian multilevel modeling (hierarchical Bayes) provides a principled framework that justifies and generalizes pragmatic rules of thumb that have been successfully used by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astro and Planetary Science
