Molecular Constraints on Synaptic Tagging and Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation: A Predictive Model
Paul Smolen, Douglas A. Baxter, John H. Byrne

TL;DR
This paper presents a computational model of synaptic plasticity that predicts how molecular mechanisms like PKM sustain long-term potentiation and memory through feedback loops, and suggests new experimental directions.
Contribution
The model integrates synaptic tagging, capture, and PKM dynamics to explain LTP maintenance and makes novel testable predictions about molecular feedback and memory persistence.
Findings
PKM activity exhibits bistability due to positive feedback.
Cross capture involves LTD-induced dendritic PKM synthesis.
Model predicts effects of PKM inhibition on LTP maintenance.
Abstract
Protein synthesis-dependent, late long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) at glutamatergic hippocampal synapses are well characterized examples of long-term synaptic plasticity. Persistent increased activity of the enzyme protein kinase M (PKM) is thought essential for maintaining LTP. Additional spatial and temporal features that govern LTP and LTD induction are embodied in the synaptic tagging and capture (STC) and cross capture hypotheses. Only synapses that have been "tagged" by an stimulus sufficient for LTP and learning can "capture" PKM. A model was developed to simulate the dynamics of key molecules required for LTP and LTD. The model concisely represents relationships between tagging, capture, LTD, and LTP maintenance. The model successfully simulated LTP maintained by persistent synaptic PKM, STC, LTD, and cross capture, and makes testable predictions concerning the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
