Nonperturbative tuning of an improved relativistic heavy-quark action with application to bottom spectroscopy
Yasumichi Aoki, Norman H. Christ, Jonathan M. Flynn, Taku Izubuchi,, Christoph Lehner, Min Li, Hao Peng, Amarjit Soni, Ruth S. Van de Water,, Oliver Witzel

TL;DR
This paper nonperturbatively tunes an improved relativistic heavy-quark action using bottom meson data, enabling precise predictions of bottomonium spectra and other heavy-meson properties with minimal discretization errors.
Contribution
It introduces a nonperturbative tuning method for the relativistic heavy-quark action applied to bottom spectroscopy, improving accuracy in lattice QCD calculations.
Findings
Bottomonium masses agree with experimental values within 0.6%.
Fine-structure splittings are predicted with 35-45% uncertainty.
The tuned parameters facilitate precise calculations of B-meson decay constants.
Abstract
We calculate the masses of bottom mesons using an improved relativistic action for the b-quarks and the RBC/UKQCD Iwasaki gauge configurations with 2+1 flavors of dynamical domain-wall light quarks. We analyze configurations with two lattice spacings: a^{-1} = 1.729 GeV (a ~ 0.11 fm) and a^{-1} = 2.281 GeV (a ~ 0.086 fm). We use an anisotropic, clover-improved Wilson action for the b-quark, and tune the three parameters of the action nonperturbatively such that they reproduce the experimental values of the B_s and B_s* heavy-light meson states. The masses and mass-splittings of the low-lying bottomonium states (such as the eta_b and Upsilon) can then be computed with no additional inputs, and comparison between these predictions and experiment provides a test of the validity of our method. We obtain bottomonium masses with total uncertainties of ~0.5-0.6% and fine-structure splittings…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
