Newborn spheroids at high redshift: when and how did the dominant, old stars in today's massive galaxies form?
S. Kaviraj, S. Cohen, R. S. Ellis, S. Peirani, R. A. Windhorst, R. W., O'Connell, J. Silk, B. C. Whitmore, N. P. Hathi, R. E. Ryan Jr, M. A. Dopita,, J. A. Frogel, A. Dekel

TL;DR
This study investigates the formation history of massive spheroidal galaxies at high redshift, revealing that their old stars formed predominantly between redshifts 2 and 5 through processes other than major mergers.
Contribution
It provides new observational evidence on the timing and mechanisms of spheroid formation, emphasizing the role of minor mergers and disk instabilities over major mergers.
Findings
Star formation peaks at redshift ~3 with short decay timescales.
Older, more massive spheroids show greater age and shorter starburst durations.
Major mergers are not the primary driver of spheroid formation.
Abstract
We study ~330 massive (M* > 10^9.5 MSun), newborn spheroidal galaxies (SGs) around the epoch of peak star formation (1<z<3), to explore the high-redshift origin of SGs and gain insight into when and how the old stellar populations that dominate today's Universe formed. The sample is drawn from the HST/WFC3 Early-Release Science programme, which provides deep 10-filter (0.2 - 1.7 micron) HST imaging over a third of the GOODS-South field. We find that the star formation episodes that built the SGs likely peaked in the redshift range 2<z<5 (with a median of z~3) and have decay timescales shorter than ~1.5 Gyr. Starburst timescales and ages show no trend with stellar mass in the range 10^9.5 < M* < 10^10.5 MSun. However, the timescales show increased scatter towards lower values (<0.3 Gyr) for M* > 10^10.5 MSun, and an age trend becomes evident in this mass regime: SGs with M* > 10^11.5…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
