Comments on "On Approximating Euclidean Metrics by Weighted t-Cost Distances in Arbitrary Dimension"
M. Emre Celebi, Hassan A. Kingravi, Fatih Celiker

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates Mukherjee’s weighted t-cost distances as Euclidean norm approximations, revealing optimistic error estimates and proposing a normalization method that enhances accuracy in high-dimensional spaces.
Contribution
It compares existing Euclidean approximation methods, identifies inaccuracies in previous error estimates, and introduces a normalization scheme that improves approximation accuracy.
Findings
Mukherjee's error estimates are overly optimistic.
Normalization significantly reduces approximation errors.
Proposed method improves accuracy in high-dimensional spaces.
Abstract
Mukherjee (Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 32, pp. 824-831, 2011) recently introduced a class of distance functions called weighted t-cost distances that generalize m-neighbor, octagonal, and t-cost distances. He proved that weighted t-cost distances form a family of metrics and derived an approximation for the Euclidean norm in . In this note we compare this approximation to two previously proposed Euclidean norm approximations and demonstrate that the empirical average errors given by Mukherjee are significantly optimistic in . We also propose a simple normalization scheme that improves the accuracy of his approximation substantially with respect to both average and maximum relative errors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
