On the existence and number of $(k+1)$-kings in $k$-quasi-transitive digraphs
Hortensia Galeana-S\'anchez, C\'esar Hern\'andez-Cruz, Manuel, Alejandro Ju\'arez-Camacho

TL;DR
This paper generalizes previous results on kings in quasi-transitive digraphs, establishing conditions for the existence and quantity of $(k+1)$-kings in $k$-quasi-transitive digraphs.
Contribution
It extends known theorems from quasi-transitive to $k$-quasi-transitive digraphs, characterizing when $(k+1)$-kings exist and their minimum number.
Findings
A $k$-quasi-transitive digraph has a $(k+1)$-king iff it has a unique initial strong component.
If a $(k+1)$-king exists, either all vertices in the initial component are $(k+1)$-kings or there are at least $(k+2)$ of them.
The results generalize previous findings for the case $k=2$ to arbitrary $k \
Abstract
Let be a digraph and an integer. We say that is -quasi-transitive if for every directed path in , then or . Clearly, a 2-quasi-transitive digraph is a quasi-transitive digraph in the usual sense. Bang-Jensen and Gutin proved that a quasi-transitive digraph has a 3-king if and only if has a unique initial strong component and, if has a 3-king and the unique initial strong component of has at least three vertices, then has at least three 3-kings. In this paper we prove the following generalization: A -quasi-transitive digraph has a -king if and only if has a unique initial strong component, and if has a -king then, either all the vertices of the unique initial strong components are -kings or the number of -kings in is at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
