Cupping with random sets
Adam R. Day, Joseph S. Miller

TL;DR
This paper characterizes K-trivial sets in terms of their cuppability properties, establishing precise conditions under which they are not weakly ML-cuppable or ML-cuppable, thereby resolving a question posed by Kučera.
Contribution
It provides a complete characterization of K-trivial sets based on their cuppability, clarifying the relationship between K-triviality and ML-cuppability.
Findings
K-trivial sets are not weakly ML-cuppable
Sets below zero jump are K-trivial iff not ML-cuppable
Answers Kučera's open question on cuppability notions
Abstract
We prove that a set is K-trivial if and only if it is not weakly ML-cuppable. Further, we show that a set below zero jump is K-trivial if and only if it is not ML-cuppable. These results settle a question of Ku\v{c}era, who introduced both cuppability notions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
