
TL;DR
This paper establishes tight lower bounds on the number of cuts needed for unfair cake division in ratio (a:b), showing that the minimal cuts grow at least as fast as the double logarithm of (a+b).
Contribution
It proves new lower bounds matching known upper bounds for the number of cuts in unfair division, advancing understanding of the problem's complexity.
Findings
Lower bound: f(a,b) ≥ lg(lg(a+b)) for all a,b.
Upper bound: f(a,b) ≤ 1 + lg(lg(a+b)) for infinitely many (a,b).
Bounds are tight up to an additive constant.
Abstract
Alice and Bob want to cut a cake; however, in contrast to the usual problems of fair division, they want to cut it unfairly. More precisely, they want to cut it in ratio . (We can assume gcd(a,b)=1.) Let f(a,b) be the number of cuts will this take (assuming both act in their own self interest). It is known that f(a,b) \le \ceil{lg(a+b)}. We show that (1) for all a,b, f(a,b) \ge lg(lg(a+b)) + (2) for an infinite number of (a,b), f(a,b) \le 1+lg(lg(a+b).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Political Philosophy and Ethics
