Deep near-infrared spectroscopy of passively evolving galaxies at z>1.4
M. Onodera, A. Renzini, M. Carollo, M. Cappellari, C. Mancini, V., Strazzullo, E. Daddi, N. Arimoto, R. Gobat, Y. Yamada, H. J. McCracken, O., Ilbert, P. Capak, A. Cimatti, M. Giavalisco, A. M. Koekemoer, X. Kong, S., Lilly, K. Motohara, K. Ohta, D. B. Sanders, N. Scoville

TL;DR
This study uses near-infrared spectroscopy to analyze passive galaxies at z>1.4, revealing their redshifts, stellar masses, sizes, and confirming their passive nature, while also addressing photometric redshift inaccuracies.
Contribution
First spectroscopic confirmation of passive galaxies at z>1.4 in the COSMOS field, with insights into their properties and redshift distribution, improving photometric redshift accuracy.
Findings
Spectroscopic redshifts align with photometric estimates with some systematic offsets.
Passive galaxies at z>1.4 are more compact than local counterparts.
Velocity dispersion measurements support virial equilibrium at these redshifts.
Abstract
[Abridged] We present the results of new near-IR spectroscopic observations of passive galaxies at z>1.4 in a concentration of BzK-selected galaxies in the COSMOS field. The observations have been conducted with Subaru/MOIRCS, and have resulted in absorption lines and/or continuum detection for 18 out of 34 objects. This allows us to measure spectroscopic redshifts for a sample almost complete to K(AB)=21. COSMOS photometric redshifts are found in fair agreement overall with the spectroscopic redshifts, with a standard deviation of ~0.05; however, ~30% of objects have photometric redshifts systematically underestimated by up to ~25%. We show that these systematic offsets in photometric redshifts can be removed by using these objects as a training set. All galaxies fall in four distinct redshift spikes at z=1.43, 1.53, 1.67 and 1.82, with this latter one including 7 galaxies. SED fits to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
