A Top-Down Account of Linear Canonical Transforms
Kurt Bernardo Wolf

TL;DR
This paper presents a unified theoretical framework for Linear Canonical Transforms (LCTs) based on the representation theory of the '2+1' Lorentz group, connecting various types of LCTs through group representations.
Contribution
It offers a top-down perspective that classifies all LCTs as parts of Lorentz group representations, unifying integral kernels and different subgroup reductions.
Findings
LCTs correspond to unitary irreducible representations of the Lorentz group.
Integral kernels for LCTs are linked to specific group representation series.
The paper unifies discrete, continuous, and mixed LCTs under a common theoretical framework.
Abstract
We contend that what are called Linear Canonical Transforms (LCTs) should be seen as a part of the theory of unitary irreducible representations of the '2+1' Lorentz group. The integral kernel representation found by Collins, Moshinsky and Quesne, and the radial and hyperbolic LCTs introduced thereafter, belong to the discrete and continuous representation series of the Lorentz group in its parabolic subgroup reduction. The reduction by the elliptic and hyperbolic subgroups can also be considered to yield LCTs that act on functions, discrete or continuous in other Hilbert spaces. We gather the summation and integration kernels reported by Basu and Wolf when studiying all discrete, continuous, and mixed representations of the linear group of real matrices. We add some comments on why all should be considered canonical.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
