Comparative study of manufacturing techniques for coronagraphic binary pupil masks: masks on substrates and free-standing masks
Keigo Enya, Kanae Haze, Takayuki Kotani, Lyu Abe

TL;DR
This study compares manufacturing methods for binary pupil masks used in coronagraphs, evaluating masks on substrates and free-standing masks through experiments, and finds high-contrast performance suitable for various telescopic applications.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of different manufacturing techniques for binary pupil masks, including on substrates and free-standing, with experimental contrast measurements.
Findings
Average contrasts: 8.4×10^{-8} for masks on BK7 glass
Free-standing copper masks achieved 1.2×10^{-7} contrast
No significant correlation between mask properties and contrast
Abstract
We present a comparative study of the manufacture of binary pupil masks for coronagraphic observations of exoplanets. A checkerboard mask design, a type of binary pupil mask design, was adopted, and identical patterns of the same size were used for all the masks in order that we could compare the differences resulting from the different manufacturing methods. The masks on substrates had aluminum checkerboard patterns with thicknesses of 0.1/0.2/0.4/0.8/1.6m constructed on substrates of BK7 glass, silicon, and germanium using photolithography and chemical processes. Free-standing masks made of copper and nickel with thicknesses of 2/5/10/20m were also realized using photolithography and chemical processes, which included careful release from the substrate used as an intermediate step in the manufacture. Coronagraphic experiments using a visible laser were carried out for all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
