Two Different Definitions on Genuine Quantum and Classical Correlations in Multipartite Systems Do Not Coincide in General
Zhanjun Zhang, Biaoliang Ye, Shao-Ming Fei

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that two different definitions of genuine quantum and classical correlations in multipartite systems generally do not agree, highlighting a fundamental distinction in how these correlations are characterized.
Contribution
It clarifies that the two prevalent definitions of genuine quantum and classical correlations are not equivalent in general multipartite systems.
Findings
The two definitions of correlations do not coincide in general.
This discrepancy impacts the understanding of quantum correlations.
The paper emphasizes the need for careful choice of correlation definitions.
Abstract
In this paper we point out that the genuine quantum and classical correlations defined by Giorgi et al in two different ways [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 190501 (2011), arXiv:1108.0434] do not coincide in general.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
