Non-thermal excitation and ionization in supernovae
Chengdong Li, D. John Hillier, and Luc Dessart

TL;DR
This paper integrates non-thermal excitation and ionization processes into supernova radiative transfer modeling, demonstrating their importance for accurate spectral predictions, especially in nebular phases, and comparing results with SN 1987A observations.
Contribution
The authors incorporate non-thermal processes into the CMFGEN code, enabling comprehensive supernova spectral modeling across all types and epochs.
Findings
Non-thermal processes significantly enhance certain spectral lines.
Inclusion of FeI affects optical spectra through line-blanketing.
Model spectra show broad agreement with SN 1987A observations.
Abstract
We incorporate non-thermal excitation and ionization processes arising from non-thermal electrons that result from \gamma-ray energy deposition, into our radiative transfer code CMFGEN. The non-thermal electron distribution is obtained by solving the Spencer-Fano equation using the procedure of Kozma & Fransson (1992). We applied the non-thermal calculations to the blue supergiant explosion model whose early evolution was studied in Dessart & Hillier (2010). Non-thermal processes generally increase excitation and ionization and decrease the temperature of the ejecta. We confirm that non-thermal processes are crucial for modeling the nebular spectra. Both optical HI and HeI lines are significantly strengthened. While optical HeI lines are not easily discerned in observational spectra due to severe blending with other lines, HeI 2.058 \mu m provides an excellent opportunity to infer the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
