Optimal phenotypic plasticity in a stochastic environment minimizes the cost/benefit ratio
Patrick Coquillard (IBSV), Alexandre Muzy (LISA), Francine Diener

TL;DR
This paper investigates how organisms can optimize phenotypic plasticity in fluctuating environments to minimize energy costs while maximizing fitness, revealing that a certain level of genetic diversity is maintained even near optimal plasticity.
Contribution
It introduces a combined numerical and analytical model to determine optimal phenotypic plasticity considering energy constraints and environmental variability.
Findings
Optimal plasticity balances energy costs and fitness benefits.
Genetic diversity persists even near optimal plasticity levels.
Species in stable environments tend to be less plastic.
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of optimal phenotypic plasticity as a response to environmental fluctuations while optimizing the cost/benefit ratio, where the cost is energetic expense of plasticity, and benefit is fitness. The dispersion matrix \Sigma of the genes' response (H = ln|\Sigma|) is used: (i) in a numerical model as a metric of the phenotypic variance reduction in the course of fitness optimization, then (ii) in an analytical model, in order to optimize parameters under the constraint of limited energy availability. Results lead to speculate that such optimized organisms should maximize their exergy and thus the direct/indirect work they exert on the habitat. It is shown that the optimal cost/benefit ratio belongs to an interval in which differences between individuals should not substantially modify their fitness. Consequently, even in the case of an ideal population,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
