
TL;DR
Over 25 years of monitoring BW Vulpeculae revealed that its period remains constant for decades, contradicting previous models of secular and binary-induced period variations, with abrupt changes followed by long epochs of stability.
Contribution
This study provides the longest continuous photometric dataset showing that BW Vul's period changes are abrupt and episodic, challenging earlier interpretations of gradual period variations.
Findings
Period has remained constant for the last 32 years.
Expected period increase around 2001 did not occur.
Period changes are abrupt, with long stable epochs.
Abstract
For the past 25 years, BW Vulpeculae has been the topic of period analyses centered on a secular period change with a periodic variation superposed, presumed to be due to light time effects in a binary system. According to this paradigm, one would expect what seems like a period increase of about 0.5 s during or soon after the year 2001. I have continued photometric monitoring through the year 2012, adding 35 new timings of maximum and minimum light. This expected change in period did not occur, which rules out that interpretation of the period variation. As of 2012, the observed timings are about two hours early compared to those predicted by the quadratic ephemeris, but are very close to those predicted by the linear ephemeris. In fact, the period has remained constant for the last 32 years, indicating that the previous epochs of constant period are almost certainly the correct…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
