Measurement of Branching Fraction and First Evidence of CP Violation in B0 --> a1+-(1260) pi-+ Decays
Belle Collaboration: J. Dalseno, I. Adachi, H. Aihara, D. M. Asner, V., Aulchenko, T. Aushev, A. M. Bakich, A. Bay, K. Belous, B. Bhuyan, A. Bozek,, M. Bra\v{c}ko, O. Brovchenko, T. E. Browder, V. Chekelian, A. Chen, P. Chen,, B. G. Cheon, K. Chilikin, R. Chistov, I.-S. Cho

TL;DR
This paper reports the measurement of the branching fraction and provides the first evidence of CP violation in B0 decays to a1(1260) pi, using a large data sample from the Belle experiment, with significant findings on mixing-induced CP violation.
Contribution
It presents the first evidence of CP violation in B0 --> a1(1260) pi decays and measures the branching fraction using the full Belle dataset, including an upper limit on a related decay mode.
Findings
Evidence of mixing-induced CP violation at 3.1 sigma
Dominance of a1+-(1260) decay rate without the spectator quark at 4.1 sigma
No significant direct CP violation observed
Abstract
We present a measurement of the branching fraction and time-dependent CP violation parameters in B0 --> a_1^+-(1260) pi^-+ decays. The results are obtained from the final data sample containing 772x10^6 BBbar pairs collected at the Upsilon(4S) resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e^+e^- collider. We also measure an upper limit on the product branching fraction for a possible decay with the same final state B0 --> a_2^+-(1320) pi^-+. In a time-dependent measurement to extract CP asymmetries, we find evidence of mixing-induced CP violation in B0 --> a_1^+-(1260) pi^-+ decays with a 3.1 sigma significance and the rate where the a_1^+-(1260) does not contain the spectator quark is found to dominate the rate where it does at the 4.1 sigma level. However, there is no evidence for either time and flavor integrated direct CP violation or flavor-dependent direct CP…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
