Remarks on "Random Sequences"
Branden Fitelson, Daniel Osherson
TL;DR
This paper highlights that classical statistical tests for randomness are dependent on the language used, implying potential limitations in their universality and reliability.
Contribution
It reveals the language dependency of classical randomness tests, questioning their effectiveness across different linguistic contexts.
Findings
Classical tests vary with language used
Randomness assessments are not universally consistent
Highlights need for language-independent tests
Abstract
In this note, we show that classical statistical tests for randomness are language dependent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms