Spectroscopic analysis of the two subgiant branches of the globular cluster NGC1851
R. G. Gratton, S. Villanova, S. Lucatello, A. Sollima, D. Geisler, E., Carretta, S. Cassisi, A. Bragaglia

TL;DR
This study uses spectroscopic data to analyze the chemical differences between the two subgiant branches of NGC1851, revealing slight metallicity variations, age differences, and distinct n-capture element distributions, shedding light on the cluster's formation history.
Contribution
It provides high-precision measurements of metallicity and element abundances for stars in both SGBs, uncovering their chemical and evolutionary distinctions for the first time.
Findings
b-SGB is slightly more metal-poor than f-SGB
f-SGB is about 0.6 Gyr older than b-SGB
Distinct n-capture element distributions between the two groups
Abstract
NGC1851 possibly shows a spread in [Fe/H], but the relation between this spread and the division in the SGB is unknown. We obtained blue (3950-4600 A) intermediate resolution (R~8,000) spectra for 47 stars on the bright and 30 on the faint SGB of NGC 1851 (b-SGB and f-SGB, respectively). The determination of the atmospheric parameters to extremely high internal accuracy leads to small errors when comparing different stars in the cluster. We found that the b-SGB is slightly more metal-poor than the f-SGB, with [Fe/H]=-1.227+/-0.009 and [Fe/H]=-1.162+/- 0.012, respectively. This implies that the f-SGB is only slightly older by ~0.6 Gyr than the b-SGB if the total CNO abundance is constant. There are more C-normal stars in the b-SGB than in the f-SGB. This is consistent with what is found for HB stars, if b-SGB are the progenitors of red HB stars, and f-SGB those of blue HB ones. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
