Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics
Brian W. Frank, Rachel E. Scherr

TL;DR
This paper explores how students maintain stable patterns of reasoning in physics through real-time interactional processes, emphasizing the importance of local contextual factors in sustaining conceptual coherences.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of local conceptual coherences and identifies interactional mechanisms that support their stability during physics learning activities.
Findings
Students exhibit multiple local coherences in reasoning about motion.
Interactional features like language and spatial feedback contribute to stability.
Mechanisms of real-time activity help sustain reasoning patterns.
Abstract
Research in student knowledge and learning of science has typically focused on explaining conceptual change. Recent research, however, documents the great degree to which student thinking is dynamic and context-sensitive, implicitly calling for explanations not only of change but also of stability. In other words: When a pattern of student reasoning is sustained in specific moments and settings, what mechanisms contribute to sustaining it? We characterize student understanding and behavior in terms of multiple local coherences in that they may be variable yet still exhibit local stabilities. We attribute stability in local conceptual coherences to real-time activities that sustain these coherences. For example, particular conceptual understandings may be stabilized by the linguistic features of a worksheet question, or by feedback from the students' spatial arrangement and orientation.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
