A simple Proof that $r^{k^{2}}$ is an upper Bound on each van der Waerden Number $W(r, k)$, for each $k$ bounded below by a certain positive real Number $\varepsilon$
Robert J. Betts

TL;DR
This paper provides a simple proof establishing that $r^{k^{2}}$ is an upper bound for van der Waerden numbers $W(r, k)$ for sufficiently large $k$, using elementary divisibility properties instead of complex combinatorial methods.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel, elementary proof that bounds van der Waerden numbers without relying on double induction or advanced combinatorial techniques.
Findings
Proves $r^{k^{2}}$ bounds $W(r, k)$ for large $k$
Uses divisibility properties rather than combinatorial arguments
Accessible approach for non-specialists in combinatorial number theory
Abstract
Here we answer a conjecture by Ron Graham about getting finer upper bounds for van der Waerden numbers in the affirmative, but without the application of double induction or combinatorics as applied to sets of integers that contain some van der Waerden number as an element. Rather we obtain the result solely by exploiting certain properties of any integer greater than one that is divisible by another integer. Our mathematical methods are easily accessible by those whose field of specialization lies outside of combinatorial number theory, such as discrete mathematics, elementary number theory or analytic number theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research
