Simulations of protostellar collapse using multigroup radiation hydrodynamics. I. The first collapse
Neil Vaytet (1), Edouard Audit (2,3), Gilles Chabrier (1,4), Benoit, Commercon (5,6), Jacques Masson (1) ((1) ENS Lyon, (2) Maison de la, Simulation, (3) CEA Saclay, (4) University of Exeter, (5) Max Planck, Institute for Astronomy, (6) ENS Paris)

TL;DR
This study uses multigroup radiation hydrodynamics to simulate the first collapse of protostellar clouds, finding that grey approximations are generally sufficient but multigroup methods reveal subtle differences, especially at later stages.
Contribution
It introduces a multigroup radiation transfer approach in 1D hydrodynamics simulations of protostellar collapse, highlighting its effects compared to grey models.
Findings
Multigroup simulations produce slightly larger first cores with higher temperature.
Results are consistent with previous studies, showing minimal differences between grey and multigroup models.
Multigroup method is more relevant in later collapse stages with high-energy radiation.
Abstract
Radiative transfer plays a major role in the process of star formation. Many simulations of gravitational collapse of a cold gas cloud followed by the formation of a protostellar core use a grey treatment of radiative transfer coupled to the hydrodynamics. However, dust opacities which dominate extinction show large variations as a function of frequency. In this paper, we used frequency-dependent radiative transfer to investigate the influence of the opacity variations on the properties of Larson's first core. We used a multigroup M1 moment model in a 1D radiation hydrodynamics code to simulate the spherically symmetric collapse of a 1 solar mass cloud core. Monochromatic dust opacities for five different temperature ranges were used to compute Planck and Rosseland means inside each frequency group. The results are very consistent with previous studies and only small differences were…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
