An equivalence between monolayer and bilayer honeycomb lattices
Gilles Montambaux

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates an equivalence between the tight-binding models of monolayer and bilayer honeycomb lattices, revealing that with specific parameters, their Hamiltonians are effectively identical, especially considering trigonal warping effects.
Contribution
It establishes a theoretical equivalence between monolayer and bilayer honeycomb lattice descriptions, highlighting the role of third nearest neighbors in this correspondence.
Findings
Hamiltonians are equivalent with appropriate parameters
Third nearest neighbors coupling is crucial
Provides a physical explanation for the equivalence
Abstract
In this brief report, we show the equivalence between the tight-binding descriptions of the monolayer and bilayer honeycomb lattices. With appropriate value of the third nearest neighbors coupling, the Hamiltonian for a monolayer is equivalent to the low energy effective Hamiltonian for bilayer in the presence of trigonal warping. A simple physical argument is provided to explain this correspondance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
