Age and helium content of the open cluster NGC 6791 from multiple eclipsing binary members. II. age dependencies and new insights
K. Brogaard, D. A. VandenBerg, H. Bruntt, F. Grundahl, S. Frandsen, L., R. Bedin, A. P. Milone, A. Dotter, G. A. Feiden, P. B. Stetson, E. Sandquist,, A. Miglio, D. Stello, and J. Jessen-Hansen

TL;DR
This study refines the age and helium content estimates of open cluster NGC 6791 using multiple eclipsing binaries, improved photometry, and extensive model comparisons, providing new insights into stellar evolution in old clusters.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis combining multiple eclipsing binaries, improved observational data, and model comparisons to accurately determine the cluster's age and helium abundance.
Findings
Cluster age estimated at ~8.3 Gyr.
Helium mass fraction constrained at Y=0.30 ± 0.01.
Supports RGB mass-loss findings from asteroseismology.
Abstract
Models of stellar structure and evolution can be constrained by measuring accurate parameters of detached eclipsing binaries in open clusters. Multiple binary stars provide the means to determine helium abundances in these old stellar systems, and in turn, to improve estimates of their age. In the first paper of this series, we demonstrated how measurements of multiple eclipsing binaries in the old open cluster NGC6791 sets tighter constraints on the properties of stellar models than has previously been possible, thereby potentially improving both the accuracy and precision of the cluster age. Here we add additional constraints and perform an extensive model comparison to determine the best estimates of the cluster age and helium content, employing as many observational constraints as possible. We improve our photometry and correct empirically for differential reddening effects. We then…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
