The sizes, masses and specific star-formation rates of massive galaxies at 1.3<z<1.5: strong evidence in favour of evolution via minor mergers
R. J. McLure, H.J. Pearce, J.S. Dunlop, M. Cirasuolo, E. Curtis-Lake,, V.A. Bruce, K. Caputi, O. Almaini, D.G. Bonfield, E. J. Bradshaw, F., Buitrago, R. Chuter, S. Foucaud, W. G. Hartley, M.J. Jarvis

TL;DR
This study investigates the relationship between galaxy size, mass, and star formation at redshift 1.3-1.5, providing evidence that minor mergers drive the observed size evolution of massive galaxies since z~1.4.
Contribution
It demonstrates that minor mergers, rather than major mergers, are the primary mechanism for size growth in massive galaxies over cosmic time.
Findings
Passive galaxies are smaller than local counterparts by a factor of ~2.4.
Minor mergers can increase galaxy size by a factor of ~3.5 with doubling stellar mass.
44% of passive galaxies exhibit disk-like morphology.
Abstract
We report the results of a comprehensive study of the relationship between galaxy size, stellar mass and specific star-formation rate (sSFR) at redshifts 1.3<z<1.5. Based on a mass complete (M_star >= 6x10^10 Msun), spectroscopic sample from the UKIDSS Ultra-deep Survey (UDS), with accurate stellar-mass measurements derived from spectro photometric fitting, we find that at z~1.4 the location of massive galaxies on the size-mass plane is determined primarily by their sSFR. At this epoch we find that massive galaxies which are passive (sSFR <= 0.1 Gyr^-1) follow a tight size-mass relation, with half-light radii a factor f=2.4+/-0.2 smaller than their local counterparts. Moreover, amongst the passive sub-sample we find no evidence that the off-set from the local size-mass relation is a function of stellar population age. Based on a sub-sample with dynamical mass estimates we also derive an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
