Asteroseismology of the open clusters NGC 6791, NGC 6811, and NGC 6819 from nineteen months of Kepler photometry
Enrico Corsaro, Dennis Stello, Daniel Huber, Timothy R. Bedding, Alfio, Bonanno, Karsten Brogaard, Thomas Kallinger, Othman Benomar, Timothy R., White, Benoit Mosser, Sarbani Basu, William J. Chaplin, J{\o}rgen, Christensen-Dalsgaard, Yvonne P. Elsworth, Rafael A. Garc\'ia

TL;DR
This study uses nineteen months of Kepler photometry to analyze solar-like oscillations in 115 red giants across three open clusters, revealing correlations between asteroseismic parameters and stellar properties, and identifying stellar evolutionary states.
Contribution
It provides detailed asteroseismic analysis of red giants in multiple clusters, highlighting differences in stellar mass and structure, and distinguishing evolutionary phases through mode period spacing.
Findings
Evidence for mass differences among cluster stars
Correlation between asteroseismic parameters and stellar properties
Identification of stellar evolutionary states and special cases
Abstract
We studied solar-like oscillations in 115 red giants in the three open clusters NGC 6791, NGC 6811, and NGC 6819, based on photometric data covering more than 19 months with NASA's Kepler space telescope. We present the asteroseismic diagrams of the asymptotic parameters \delta\nu_02, \delta\nu_01 and \epsilon, which show clear correlation with fundamental stellar parameters such as mass and radius. When the stellar populations from the clusters are compared, we see evidence for a difference in mass of the red giant branch stars, and possibly a difference in structure of the red clump stars, from our measurements of the small separations \delta\nu_02 and \delta\nu_01. Ensemble \'{e}chelle diagrams and upper limits to the linewidths of l = 0 modes as a function of \Delta\nu of the clusters NGC 6791 and NGC 6819 are also shown, together with the correlation between the l = 0 ridge width…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
