New Directions in Categorical Logic, for Classical, Probabilistic and Quantum Logic
Bart Jacobs (Institute for Computing, Information Sciences (iCIS),, Radboud University Nijm)

TL;DR
This paper develops a categorical framework for classical, probabilistic, and quantum logic, emphasizing effect modules, predicates, and measurement, with applications to quantum foundations and dynamic logic.
Contribution
It introduces a novel categorical approach where effect modules serve as predicates, formalizes measurement and side-effects, and advances the axiomatization of quantum and probabilistic logic.
Findings
Predicates modeled as effect modules in categories with effect algebra structure
Abstract Born rule for validity probabilities in various logical settings
Categorical formalization of measurement and side-effects in quantum systems
Abstract
Intuitionistic logic, in which the double negation law not-not-P = P fails, is dominant in categorical logic, notably in topos theory. This paper follows a different direction in which double negation does hold. The algebraic notions of effect algebra/module that emerged in theoretical physics form the cornerstone. It is shown that under mild conditions on a category, its maps of the form X -> 1+1 carry such effect module structure, and can be used as predicates. Predicates are identified in many different situations, and capture for instance ordinary subsets, fuzzy predicates in a probabilistic setting, idempotents in a ring, and effects (positive elements below the unit) in a C*-algebra or Hilbert space. In quantum foundations the duality between states and effects plays an important role. It appears here in the form of an adjunction, where we use maps 1 -> X as states. For such a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
