Necessity as justified truth
Steffen Lewitzka

TL;DR
This paper develops a logic that defines necessity through justifications, extending existing logics with algebraic semantics, and shows how modal logics S4 and S5 can be captured within this framework.
Contribution
It introduces a justification-based logic for necessity, extending Suszko's non-Fregean logic with algebraic semantics and modal principles, unifying justification and modal logics.
Findings
Necessity is definable via justifications within the logic.
Soundness and completeness of the system are established.
Modal logics S4 and S5 are characterized by additional semantic constraints.
Abstract
We present a logic for the reasoning about necessity and justifications which is independent from relational semantics. We choose the concept of justification -- coming from a class of "Justification Logics" (Artemov 2008, Fitting 2009) -- as the primitive notion on which the concept of necessity is based. Our axiomatization extends Suszko's non-Fregean logic SCI (Brown, Suszko 1972) by basic axioms from Justification Logic, axioms for quantification over propositions and over justifications, and some further principles. The core axiom is: is necessarily true iff there is a justification for . That is, necessity is first-order definable by means of justifications. Instead of defining purely algebraic models in the style of (Brown, Suszko 1972) we extend the semantics investigated in (Lewitzka 2012) by some algebraic structure for dealing with justifications and prove…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Semantic Web and Ontologies
