The Lick AGN Monitoring Project 2011: Dynamical Modeling of the Broad Line Region in Mrk 50
Anna Pancoast, Brendon J. Brewer, Tommaso Treu, Aaron J. Barth, Vardha, N. Bennert, Gabriela Canalizo, Alexei V. Filippenko, Elinor L. Gates, Jenny, E. Greene, Weidong Li, Matthew A. Malkan, David J. Sand, Daniel Stern,, Jong-Hak Woo, Roberto J. Assef, Hyun-Jin Bae

TL;DR
This study models the broad line region in Mrk 50 using reverberation mapping data, revealing a nearly face-on thick disk structure and providing a direct black hole mass estimate without relying on a virial factor.
Contribution
It introduces a direct dynamical modeling approach for the BLR that constrains geometry, kinematics, and black hole mass without the usual virial coefficient dependence.
Findings
BLR geometry is a nearly face-on thick disk.
Black hole mass is estimated as log10(M/Msun)=7.57.
Virial coefficient aligns with typical values.
Abstract
We present dynamical modeling of the broad line region (BLR) in the Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 50 using reverberation mapping data taken as part of the Lick AGN Monitoring Project (LAMP) 2011. We model the reverberation mapping data directly, constraining the geometry and kinematics of the BLR, as well as deriving a black hole mass estimate that does not depend on a normalizing factor or virial coefficient. We find that the geometry of the BLR in Mrk 50 is a nearly face-on thick disk, with a mean radius of 9.6(+1.2,-0.9) light days, a width of the BLR of 6.9(+1.2,-1.1) light days, and a disk opening angle of 25\pm10 degrees above the plane. We also constrain the inclination angle to be 9(+7,-5) degrees, close to face-on. Finally, the black hole mass of Mrk 50 is inferred to be log10(M(BH)/Msun) = 7.57(+0.44,-0.27). By comparison to the virial black hole mass estimate from traditional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
