Multi-wavelength Observations of the Type IIb Supernova 2009mg
S. R. Oates, A. J. Bayless, M. D. Stritzinger, T. Prichard, J. L., Prieto, S. Immler, P. J. Brown, A. A. Breeveld, M. De Pasquale, N. P. M., Kuin, M. Hamuy, S. T Holland, F. Taddia, P. W. A. Roming

TL;DR
This paper reports multi-wavelength observations of supernova 2009mg, comparing its properties to other Type IIb supernovae, and derives physical parameters such as energy, ejecta mass, and nickel mass.
Contribution
It provides detailed observational data and modeling of SN 2009mg, highlighting similarities and differences with other Type IIb supernovae, and constrains progenitor mass-loss rate and explosion parameters.
Findings
SN 2009mg has a slower rise and broader light curves than similar supernovae.
Late-time decay suggests gamma-ray leakage and a smaller stellar mass.
Derived explosion energy, ejecta mass, and nickel mass are 0.15x10^51 erg, 0.56 Msun, and 0.10 Msun respectively.
Abstract
We present Swift UVOT and XRT observations, and visual wavelength spectroscopy of the Type IIb supernova (SN) 2009mg, discovered in the Sb galaxy ESO 121-G26. The observational properties of SN 2009mg are compared to the prototype Type IIb SNe 1993J and 2008ax, with which we find many similarities. However, minor differences are discernible including SN 2009mg not exhibiting an initial fast decline or u-band upturn as observed in the comparison objects, and its rise to maximum is somewhat slower leading to slightly broader light curves. The late-time temporal index of SN 2009mg, determined from 40 days post-explosion, is consistent with the decay rate of SN 1993J, but inconsistent with the decay of 56Co. This suggests leakage of gamma-rays out of the ejecta and a stellar mass on the small side of the mass distribution. Our XRT non-detection provides an upper limit on the mass-loss rate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
