Uncertainties and Ambiguities in Percentiles and how to Avoid Them
Michael Schreiber

TL;DR
This paper discusses how fractional scoring can eliminate uncertainties and ambiguities in percentile rank evaluations, ensuring precise and reproducible publication assessments.
Contribution
It introduces the fractional scoring scheme as a method to avoid uncertainties in percentile-based evaluation metrics.
Findings
Fractional scoring removes uncertainties in percentile evaluations.
Total scores with fractional scoring match theoretical values.
The method ensures precise and unambiguous publication ranking.
Abstract
The recently proposed fractional scoring scheme is used to attribute publications to percentile rank classes. It is shown that in this way uncertainties and ambiguities in the evaluation of percentile ranks do not occur. Using the fractional scoring the total score of all papers exactly reproduces the theoretical value.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques · Statistics Education and Methodologies
