
TL;DR
This paper explores two methods of representing tolerances in algebraic varieties, analyzing their relationships and applying these concepts to lattices, thereby extending understanding of tolerance representations in algebraic structures.
Contribution
It introduces and compares two tolerance representation methods, clarifies their relationships, and applies these to lattices, connecting to recent research in the field.
Findings
Any lattice tolerance can be represented as a congruence image on a subalgebra of its product
The second representation method is independent of the variety
Relationships between the two representations are clarified
Abstract
We discuss two possible ways of representing tolerances: first, as a homomorphic image of some congruence; second, as the relational composition of some compatible relation with its converse. The second way is independent from the variety under consideration, while the first way is variety-dependent. The relationships between these two kinds of representations are clarified. As an application, we show that any tolerance on some lattice L is the image of some congruence on a subalgebra of L L. This is related to recent results by G. Cz\'edli and E. W. Kiss.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
