Planck Intermediate Results. IV. The XMM-Newton validation programme for new Planck galaxy clusters
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown,, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G., Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli,, I. Bikmaev, H. B\"ohringer, A. Bonaldi, J. R. Bond

TL;DR
This paper validates new Planck galaxy cluster candidates using XMM-Newton, confirming 14 out of 15 observed, and analyzes their properties, detection reliability, and scaling relations, enhancing the understanding of cluster detection at low SZ flux and high redshift.
Contribution
It presents the final results of the XMM-Newton validation program for Planck galaxy clusters, including detection rates, reliability indicators, and scaling relation analysis, especially in the low SZ flux and high-z regime.
Findings
14 new clusters detected by XMM-Newton
Association with RASS-BSC source indicates candidate reliability
Clusters follow established YX-Y500 relation, with some differences in X-ray luminosity
Abstract
We present the final results from the XMM-Newton validation follow-up of new Planck galaxy cluster candidates. We observed 15 new candidates, detected with signal-to-noise ratios between 4.0 and 6.1 in the 15.5-month nominal Planck survey. The candidates were selected using ancillary data flags derived from the ROSAT All Sky Survey (RASS) and Digitized Sky Survey all-sky maps, with the aim of pushing into the low SZ flux, high-z regime and testing RASS flags as indicators of candidate reliability. 14 new clusters were detected by XMM, including 2 double systems. Redshifts lie in the range 0.2 to 0.9, with 6 clusters at z>0.5. Estimated M500 range from 2.5 10^14 to 8 10^14 Msun. We discuss our results in the context of the full XMM validation programme, in which 51 new clusters have been detected. This includes 4 double and 2 triple systems, some of which are chance projections on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
