Eistein-Podolski-Rosen paradox, non-commuting operator, complete wavefunction and entanglement
Andrew Das Arulsamy

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the EPR paradox, identifies a hidden assumption behind it, and clarifies that entanglement between separated particles requires proper measurement to be confirmed, reinforcing quantum theory.
Contribution
The paper reveals a hidden assumption in the EPR paradox and clarifies the conditions under which entanglement can be experimentally verified.
Findings
EPR paradox arises from a hidden assumption
Proper measurement is essential to confirm entanglement
Reinforces the correctness of quantum theory
Abstract
Einstein, Podolski and Rosen (EPR) have shown that any wave function (subject to the Schr\"odinger equation) can describe the physical reality completely, and any two observables associated to two non-commuting operators can have simultaneous reality. In contrast, quantum theory claims that the wave function can capture the physical reality completely, and the physical quantities associated to two non-commuting operators cannot have simultaneous reality. The above contradiction is known as the EPR paradox. Here, we unambiguously expose that there is a hidden assumption made by EPR, which gives rise to this famous paradox. Putting the assumption right this time leads us not to the paradox, but only reinforces the correctness of the quantum theory. However, it is shown here that the entanglement phenomenon between two physically separated particles (they were entangled prior to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
