Quantum Tomography via Compressed Sensing: Error Bounds, Sample Complexity, and Efficient Estimators

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that low-rank quantum states can be efficiently reconstructed using compressed sensing techniques, reducing sample complexity and improving fidelity over traditional methods, with theoretical guarantees and practical simulations.

Contribution

It provides new theoretical error bounds and sample complexity estimates for compressed quantum tomography, along with practical estimators outperforming maximum-likelihood estimation.

Findings

Compressed sensing estimators outperform MLE in fidelity.

Sample complexity decreases with the rank of the state.

Incomplete measurements enable faster processing without accuracy loss.

Abstract

Intuitively, if a density operator has small rank, then it should be easier to estimate from experimental data, since in this case only a few eigenvectors need to be learned. We prove two complementary results that confirm this intuition. First, we show that a low-rank density matrix can be estimated using fewer copies of the state, i.e., the sample complexity of tomography decreases with the rank. Second, we show that unknown low-rank states can be reconstructed from an incomplete set of measurements, using techniques from compressed sensing and matrix completion. These techniques use simple Pauli measurements, and their output can be certified without making any assumptions about the unknown state. We give a new theoretical analysis of compressed tomography, based on the restricted isometry property (RIP) for low-rank matrices. Using these tools, we obtain near-optimal error bounds, for the realistic situation where the data contains noise due to finite statistics, and the density matrix is full-rank with decaying eigenvalues. We also obtain upper-bounds on the sample complexity of compressed tomography, and almost-matching lower bounds on the sample complexity of any procedure using adaptive sequences of Pauli measurements. Using numerical simulations, we compare the performance of two compressed sensing estimators with standard maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE). We find that, given comparable experimental resources, the compressed sensing estimators consistently produce higher-fidelity state reconstructions than MLE. In addition, the use of an incomplete set of measurements leads to faster classical processing with no loss of accuracy. Finally, we show how to certify the accuracy of a low rank estimate using direct fidelity estimation and we describe a method for compressed quantum process tomography that works for processes with small Kraus rank.