How Constrained is the cMSSM?
Diptimoy Ghosh, Monoranjan Guchait, Sreerup Raychaudhuri, Dipan, Sengupta

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the parameter space of the cMSSM considering recent experimental constraints, highlighting the impact of $ aneta$, B-physics, and potential Higgs mass measurements on its viability and future LHC searches.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of the cMSSM parameter space under current experimental constraints and discusses strategies to extend LHC searches beyond current limits.
Findings
Large parameter space remains allowed at low/moderate $ aneta$.
B-physics constraints are dominant at large $ aneta$, pushing sparticle masses above 1 TeV.
Precise Higgs mass measurement could significantly influence the allowed parameter space.
Abstract
We study the allowed parameter space of the constrained minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (cMSSM) in the light of direct searches, constraints from -physics (including the recent measurement of the branching ratio for ) and the dark matter relic density. For low or moderate values of , the strongest constraints are those imposed by direct searches, and therefore, large areas of the parameter space are still allowed. In the large limit, however, the -physics constraints are more restrictive, effectively forcing the squark and gluino masses to lie close to or above a TeV. A light Higgs boson could dramatically change the allowed parameter space, but we need to know its mass precisely for this to be effective. We emphasize that it is still too early to write off the cMSSM, even in the large limit. Finally we explore…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
