Motion of the Local Group as a cosmological probe

TL;DR

This thesis uses the motion of the Local Group to estimate the matter density of the universe, combining observational data with theoretical models to provide a new measurement consistent with prior estimates.

Contribution

It introduces two methods to estimate the matter density parameter Omega_m using the Local Group's motion and galaxy clustering data, enhancing measurement precision.

Findings

Estimated Omega_m as 0.2, consistent with previous studies.

Developed methods combining peculiar velocity and clustering dipole data.

Improved measurement accuracy of cosmological parameters.

Abstract

In this thesis, we use the motion of the Local Group of galaxies (LG) through the Universe to measure the cosmological parameter of non-relativistic matter density, Omega_m. For that purpose, we compare the peculiar velocity of the LG with its gravitational acceleration. The former is known from the dipole of the cosmic microwave background radiation and the latter is estimated here from the clustering dipole of galaxies in the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) Extended Source Catalog. We start by presenting the general framework of perturbation theory of gravitational instability in the expanding Universe and how it applies to the peculiar motion of the LG. Next, we study a particular effect for the dipole measurement, related to the fact that a nearby Local Void is partially hidden behind our Galaxy. We then describe in detail how we handled the 2MASS extragalactic data for the purpose of our analysis. Finally, we present two methods to estimate the density Omega_m, combined with the linear biasing b into the parameter beta = (Omega_m)^{0.55} / b, from the comparison of the LG velocity and acceleration. The first approach is to study the growth of the 2MASS clustering dipole with increased depth of the sample and compare it with theoretical expectations. The second is to apply the maximum-likelihood method in order to improve the precision of the measurement. With both these methods we find beta=0.4 and Omega_m=0.2, which is consistent with various independent estimates. We also briefly mention some future prospects in the field.