Is an imaginary fixed point physical or unphysical?
Fan Zhong

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether an imaginary fixed point in a $\
Contribution
It demonstrates that the imaginary fixed point in the $\
Findings
Imaginary fixed points are physically meaningful.
Scaling behavior is governed by the imaginary fixed point.
Divergence of the RG flow occurs at a finite scale.
Abstract
It has been proposed that a first-order phase transition driven to happen in the metastable region exhibits scaling and universality near an instability point controlled by an instability fixed point of a theory. However, this fixed point has an imaginary value and the renormalization-group flow of the coupling diverges at a finite scale. Here combining a momentum-space RG analysis and a nucleation theory near the spinodal point, we show that imaginary rather than real values are physical counter-intuitively and thus the imaginary fixed point does control the scaling.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Physics and Python Applications
