On the pulse-width statistics in radio pulsars. III. Importance of the conal profile components
K. Maciesiak (1), J. Gil (1), G. Melikidze (1,2) ((1) Kepler Institute, of Astronomy, University of Zielona G\'ora, Zielona G\'ora, Poland, (2) Ilia, State University, E. Kharadze Abastumani Astrophysical Observatory, Tbilisi,, Georgia)

TL;DR
This study extends the analysis of pulse-width boundaries in radio pulsars to conal components, supporting a model where both core and conal emissions originate at similar altitudes near the polar cap, influenced by magnetic field geometry.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the lower boundary in pulse-widths applies to conal components and extends Rankin's inclination angle estimation method to these components.
Findings
Lower boundary exists for conal pulse-widths similar to core components.
Emission regions are at about 50 stellar radii, with core possibly slightly lower.
Magnetic field geometry influences pulse-width boundaries.
Abstract
This work is a continuation of two previous papers of a series, in which we examined the pulse-width statistics of normal radio pulsars. In the first paper we compiled the largest ever database of pulsars with interpulses in their mean profiles. In the second one we confirmed the existence of the lower boundary in the scatter plot of core component pulse-widths versus pulsar period W50 sim 2.5 P^{-0.5}[deg], first discovered by Rankin using much smaller number of interpulse cases. In this paper we show that the same lower boundary also exists for conal profile components. Rankin proposed a very simple method of estimation of pulsar inclination angle based on comparing the width W50 of its core component with the period dependent value of the lower boundary. We claim that this method can be extended to conal components as well. To explain an existence of the lower boundary Rankin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
