Swift follow-up observations of candidate gravitational-wave transient events
P. A. Evans, J. K. Fridriksson, N. Gehrels, J. Homan, J. P. Osborne,, M. Siegel, A. Beardmore, P. Handbauer, J. Gelbord, J. A. Kennea, M. Smith, Q., Zhu, J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. Abernathy,, T. Accadia, F. Acernese, C. Adams, T. Adams

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the feasibility of rapid multi-wavelength follow-up observations of candidate gravitational-wave events, highlighting the potential for electromagnetic counterparts to aid in astrophysical source identification.
Contribution
It presents the first combined electromagnetic and GW follow-up analysis of candidate events from LIGO and Virgo, establishing methods and sensitivity improvements for future routine detections.
Findings
Electromagnetic follow-ups found no astrophysical counterparts.
GW data analysis showed no evidence of astrophysical origin for the events.
The study demonstrates the potential for routine multi-messenger GW observations.
Abstract
We present the first multi-wavelength follow-up observations of two candidate gravitational-wave (GW) transient events recorded by LIGO and Virgo in their 2009-2010 science run. The events were selected with low latency by the network of GW detectors and their candidate sky locations were observed by the Swift observatory. Image transient detection was used to analyze the collected electromagnetic data, which were found to be consistent with background. Off-line analysis of the GW data alone has also established that the selected GW events show no evidence of an astrophysical origin; one of them is consistent with background and the other one was a test, part of a "blind injection challenge". With this work we demonstrate the feasibility of rapid follow-ups of GW transients and establish the sensitivity improvement joint electromagnetic and GW observations could bring. This is a first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
