Chandra High resolution Observations of CID-42, a candidate recoiling SMBH
F. Civano, M. Elvis, G. Lanzuisi, T. Aldcroft, M. Trichas, A., Bongiorno, M. Brusa, L. Blecha, A. Comastri, A. Loeb, M. Salvato, A., Fruscione, A. Koekemoer, S. Komossa, R. Gilli, V. Mainieri, E. Piconcelli, C., Vignali

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution Chandra observations to investigate CID-42, a candidate recoiling supermassive black hole, revealing that only one optical source hosts an unobscured AGN, supporting the gravitational wave recoil scenario.
Contribution
First high-resolution X-ray imaging clarifies the nature of CID-42's optical sources, favoring the recoiling SMBH hypothesis over a dual AGN system.
Findings
Only one optical source shows X-ray emission, indicating an unobscured AGN.
The second source likely hosts a star-forming region, not an obscured SMBH.
A new X-ray feature was discovered near the main source.
Abstract
We present Chandra High Resolution Camera observations of CID-42, a candidate recoiling supermassive black hole (SMBH) at z=0.359 in the COSMOS survey. CID-42 shows two optical compact sources resolved in the HST/ACS image embedded in the same galaxy structure and a velocity offset of ~1300 km/s between the H\beta\ broad and narrow emission line, as presented by Civano et al. (2010). Two scenarios have been proposed to explain the properties of CID-42: a GW recoiling SMBH and a double Type 1/ Type 2 AGN system, where one of the two is recoiling because of slingshot effect. In both scenario, one of the optical nuclei hosts an unobscured AGN, while the other one, either an obscured AGN or a star forming compact region. The X-ray Chandra data allow to unambiguously resolve the X-ray emission, and unveil the nature, of the two optical sources in CID-42. We find that only one of the optical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
